Skip to main content

Why the Housing Requirement for Neighbourhood Areas should be zero

Photo by Chris Barbalis on Unsplash
In May 2019, the government updated its national planning practice guidance on neighbourhood planning. Notably, a number of new paragraphs relating to local planning authorities' duty to set housing requirements for Neighbourhood Areas were introduced.

Whilst the guidance is welcomed, there remains uncertainty about how the housing requirement should be calculated - in particular how Local Plan site allocations should be taken into account in the calculation.

Duty to set housing requirement for Neighbourhood Areas

The idea of setting a housing target for Neighbourhood Areas was first mooted in the government's Housing White Paper for the purpose of helping Neighbourhood Plans to be produced expediently. 

The updated National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) introduced a duty for local planning authorities to set out a housing requirement figure for designated Neighbourhood Areas through their Local Plans:
...strategic policies should also set out a housing requirement for designated neighbourhood areas which reflects the overall strategy for the pattern and scale of development and any relevant allocations.
Para. 65, National Planning Policy Framework

National planning practice guidance notes there is 'no set method' for calculating the housing requirement, and continues that 'the general policy making process already undertaken by local authorities can continue to be used to direct development' along with other relevant policies and evidence.

Advantages to identifying housing requirement through Local Plans

There are clear benefits to identifying housing requirements for designated Neighbourhood Areas through the strategic policies of the Local Plan.

Omitting the need for retesting will provide certainty for emerging Neighbourhood Plans. NPPF paragraph 65 continues:
... Once the strategic policies have been adopted, these figures should not need retesting at the neighbourhood plan examination, unless there has been a significant change in circumstances that affects the requirement.
Since the strategic policy will be subject to consultation during the process of preparing the Local Plan. All the difficult arguments around what the housing requirement should be in any given area should, in theory, be directed at the local planning authority writing its Local Plan, rather than overwhelming the neighbourhood planning group. In addition, the policy will be tested through the Local Plan examination, thereby demonstrating that the housing requirement is 'sound'.

By setting the housing target for all Neighbourhood Areas in the district at the same time should help to  provide clarity and ensure the approach is fair.

In addition, this approach could potentially make the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Habitats Regulation Assessment (HRA) process more straight forward, as the housing requirement will have already been tested through the Local Plan process.

Must a Neighbourhood Plan meet its housing requirement?

The basic conditions require Neighbourhood Plans to be in 'general conformity' with strategic policies for the area. However, there is no specific obligation on the Neighbourhood Plan to deliver the housing requirement set by the Local Plan, so long as it does not prevent the housing requirement from being met.

For example, the Neighbourhood Plan could choose to remain silent on the issue of housing development, leaving the job of allocating sites to the Local Plan to deal with.

However, where a Neighbourhood Plan makes provision for the housing requirement in full through its policies and site allocations, NPPF paragraph 14 grants extra protection against unplanned developments. The benefits of this extra protection are discussed in Presumption-proofing Neighbourhood Plans.

For many areas, NPPF paragraph 14 will be a major incentive to producing a Neighbourhood Plan, in order to fend off unplanned developments, whilst allocating sites supported by the community.

Providing an indicative housing requirement

The duty to set a housing requirement was introduced by the revised NPPF, and is therefore a new addition to the planning system. It will therefore be some time until all Local Plans meet this new duty.

Where it is not possible to provide a housing requirement figure, for example where a new Local Plan is not being prepared, national policy requires local planning authorities to provide an indicative housing requirement figure, where requested to do so by the neighbourhood planning group.

National policy requires the indicative housing figure to be based on evidence, such as housing need and population, and to be aligned with the planning strategy for the area. However it is not clear whether an indicative housing figure will have the same status as a housing requirement set through a Local Plan policy, which will have been subject to consultation and tested through the Local Plan examination.

Indicative housing figures may be scrutinised during consultation and examination of the Neighbourhood Plan, particularly by those with land interests in the area.

Setting the housing requirement - and why it should (normally) be zero

For new Local Plans, the housing target for the whole authority area will normally be calculated using the government's Local Housing Need method.

National policy requires local plans to 'provide a clear strategy for bringing sufficient land forward, and at a sufficient rate, to address objectively assessed needs over the plan period'. Through national policy, government appears to have a clear expectation that Local Plans will identify development sites to meet its Local Housing Need in full:
This should include planning for and allocating sufficient sites to deliver the strategic priorities of the area...
Para. 23, NPPF

Local Plans typically identify specific sites for development (known as site allocations) to meet and likely exceed the housing requirement for the area.

Many local planning authorities may simply tot up the supply of dwellings from site allocations in the Neighbourhood Area, and set this amount as the housing requirement.

For example, if the Local Plan's growth strategy allocates two sites each for 50 dwellings in a Neighbourhood Area, it is logical to assume that the Neighbourhood Area Housing Requirement should be 100 dwellings. In such a scenario, it would be difficult to imagine any other figure being applied.

However, the following paragraph from national planning practice guidance means this logic is flawed.
... Neighbourhood plans should not re-allocate sites that are already allocated through these strategic plans.
NPPG Paragraph: 044 Reference ID: 41-044-20190509

Not re-allocating sites which are already allocated in a Local Plan does make sense. There is no point in duplicating policies as the Local Plan and Neighbourhood Plans should be read as a whole. 

As set out in NPPF paragraph 65, the housing requirement should reflect 'the overall strategy for the pattern and scale of development and any relevant allocations'.

Therefore in my imaginary scenario with a Local Plan which allocates two sites of 50 dwellings in a Neighbourhood Area, the Neighbourhood Plan cannot 're-allocate' the sites already allocated by the Local Plan. 

The Neighbourhood Plan may be able to allocate alternative sites, but with an up-to-date Local Plan in place, this probably wouldn't make much sense. The Neighbourhood Plan would likely be able to allocate additional sites, thereby boosting the supply of housing in the area - but this would be over and above the 'requirement' for the area.

As the Neighbourhood Plan cannot re-allocate the same sites, the housing requirement cannot therefore be 100. The sum total of dwelling supply from the Local Plan site allocations should therefore be subtracted from the housing requirement.

Therefore the housing requirement should be zero.

Implications for NPPF Paragraph 14

A housing requirement of zero doesn't make a great deal of sense in the context of NPPF paragraph 14, which offers extra protection from unplanned developments in areas with Neighbourhood Plans in force (in  circumstances where the 'presumption in favour of sustainable development' applies - see Presumption-proofing Neighbourhood Plans).

To benefit from this extra protection, paragraph 14 requires Neighbourhood Plans to contain 'policies and allocations to meet its identified housing requirement'. A housing requirement of zero would therefore be illogical -  a Neighbourhood Plan cannot make site allocations for 'zero' dwellings.

Presumably to take advantage of paragraph 14, where the housing requirement is zero, a Neighbourhood Plan would have to exceed the housing requirement by allocating sites for development.


The scenario I've described above (a Local Plan with site allocations to meet its housing need in full) is fairly common. However there will no doubt be many exceptions to this approach.

For example, in some Local Plans site allocations may be less clearly defined - for example the Local Plan may identify 'broad locations for growth', which could reasonably be firmed up through a Neighbourhood Plan.

In other areas, the local planning authority may produce their Local Plan in two parts - with strategic policies and housing targets being set out in Part 1, and site allocations and development management policies in Part 2. This might create an opportunity for the Neighbourhood Plan to make site allocations which follow on from the Part 1 Local Plan.

In these examples, the housing requirement may be calculated in a different way.

Why the housing requirement calculation matters

How the housing requirement is calculated really matters. In some planning appeals, appellants have claimed Neighbourhood Plans have inappropriately re-allocated Local Plan sites, in an attempt to undermine the Neighbourhood Plan and argue that it does not meet its housing requirement or the criteria set out in paragraph 14.

National planning practice should be amended to provide greater clarity on how the housing requirement should be calculated for Neighbourhood Areas. Without a robust approach, Neighbourhood Plans may not provide protection against unplanned developments. 


Popular posts from this blog

Why the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan failed

News that the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan was rejected at referendum has spread rapidly across social media and has even been picked up by local and national press - see BBC article.

The story has garnered a lot of attention as it is highly unusual for a Neighbourhood Plan to be rejected. The Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan is only the third Neighbourhood Plan not to be supported by residents.

At the referendum held on 14 March 2019, the Neighbourhood Plan was rejected, albeit by a very slim margin of just 22 votes.
'No' Campaign Prior to the referendum, Labour town councillors led a campaign which encouraged local people to vote against the Neighbourhood Plan. 
Based on the literature shared by the campaign group, opposition to the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan appears to be pointed at three key issues: Impacts on the town and its infrastructure of the overall scale of growth Middlewich is expected deliverDisagreement with the individual sites identified by the Neighbourhood …

Latest stats show continued increase in house-building

Chart: All Things Neighbourhood Planning
Data source: Live tables on housebuilding: new build dwellings (Table 209), MHCLG

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government has today published its latest data on house building in the United Kingdom. The graph shows the number of dwellings completed by financial year in England. Data is also available for the other home nations. However, Neighbourhood Planning is a feature of the English planning system only.

In 2017/18, there were more than 160,500 new homes constructed. - the highest rate of development since the financial crisis of 2007-08. As illustrated in the graph, the data shows a steady increase in number of homes built each year since the low-point of 2012-13, where less than 108,000 homes were built. 

The rate of development in 2017/18 is comparable to the period 2004 - 2006. Assuming this trend of increasing development rates continues into the current financial year, the number of homes constructed in 2018/19 could po…

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans made in July 2019

Neighbourhood Plans provide a bespoke planning framework for the local area. No two plans are alike, although many have similar characteristics and address common themes. This post provides a short summary of those Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in July 2019, highlighting the elements which make each plan locally specific and unique.

The purpose of this post is to celebrate the achievement of those communities in successfully preparing their Neighbourhood Plans, and to share the interesting ideas and policies for the benefit of others who are currently writing their plans. Links to the Neighbourhood Plans are provided throughout the post.
Navigate this post using the map July was a busy month, with a whopping 24 Neighbourhood Plans successfully passing referendum. To  make it easier to navigate this post, the location of the areas covered by each new Neighbourhood Plan are shown on the interactive map. Click on a marker to reveal a link to the plan's su…

Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire

An appeal decision initially caught my eye due to its surprising interpretation of 'infill development' -  but also raises some concerning issues around how Neighbourhood Plan policies are applied during the decision-making process.

The appeal relates to an application for the construction of up to 140 dwellings, new public open space, associated landscaping and site infrastructure on a 3.9ha site at Chinnor, Oxfordshire. The application was made by Persimmon Homes and initially refused by South Oxfordshire District Council. The appeal was allowed, meaning the Planning Inspector went against the district council's decision grant planning permission for the scheme. Details of the appeal can be found using the following reference APP/Q3115/W/17/3187058. Neighbourhood Plan & Development Plan Chinnor is a large village in Oxfordshire. The Chinnor Neighbourhood Plan (CNP) was 'made' in October 2017. When the appeal commenced, the Neighbourhood Plan was less than one…

Putting Health & Wellbeing at the Heart of Neighbourhood Planning

The planning system's origins can be traced back to public health policies from the nineteenth century. Increases in population and the growth of towns created public health problems, and early legislation focused on creating sanitary conditions.

There is a sense that in recent decades planning has lost its way with health, yet our modern environments continue to have profound effects on our health and well-being. In the blog post What stops us from creating healthier places? author Rachel Toms notes that overall, the planning system has done a good job of designing infectious diseases out of the places in which people live, but has "inadvertently contributed to sedentary lifestyles, mental distress and social isolation".

Whilst the planning system has cured the public health problems of the industrial revolution, it faces a new set of public health challenges for the modern era.

In this post, I make the case for prioritising health and wellbeing through Neighbourhood P…

Appeal granted in countryside despite Five Year Land Supply - Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan

Through a recent appeal decision, a Planning Inspector has granted outline planning permission for up to 55 dwellings and 'Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace' (SANG) at land at Parklands, east of Basingstoke Road, Spencers Wood, Wokingham.

The decision was issued on 28th February 2019, under appeal reference APP/X0360/W/18/3204133.

The appeal site is located between two villages, Three Mile Cross and Spencers Wood. The scheme proposes two areas of development adjoining each of the villages, separated by an area of open space - a 'SANG'.
Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan The Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) was made in February 2017. Policy 1 of the SNP addresses the location of development:

In Shinfield Parish, development within the Development Limits..., will be supported; development adjacent to the Development Limits will only be supported where the benefits of the development outweigh its adverse impacts. 

'Development limits' are a very common planning …

Neighbourhood Planning and Community Health and Wellbeing - Briefing Note for NALC

I have teamed up with the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) to author a briefing note on Neighbourhood Planning and Community Health and Wellbeing.

The briefing note illustrates how Neighbourhood Plans can actively contribute to improving health and wellbeing in their communities, and draws on recent examples of neighbourhood plan policies. Neighbourhood Plans can tackle issues of health and wellbeing in lots of different ways, as explained in the briefing note, and is something I will be making the case for in future blog posts.

A pdf version of the briefing note is available to view and download below. Further advice on neighbourhood planning is also available from NALC's website.

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans Made in September 2019

This post explores Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in September 2019, highlighting elements which make each plan locally specific and unique. The following Neighbourhood Plans passed referendum in September 2019:
Bawtry Neighbourhood Plan (Doncaster Council)Brackenfield Neighbourhood Plan (North East Derbyshire District Council)Chelford Neighbourhood Plan (Cheshire East Council)Congresbury Neighbourhood Plan (North Somerset Council)Glentworth Neighbourhood Plan (West Lindsey District Council)Hanslope Neighbourhood Plan (Milton Keynes Council)Hullavington Neighbourhood Plan (Wiltshire Council)Huntingdon Neighbourhood Plan (Huntingdonshire District Council)Misterton Neighbourhood Plan (Bassetlaw District Council)Moreton, Bobbingworth and the Lavers Neighbourhood Plan (Epping Forest District Council)Sedgefield Neighbourhood Plan (Durham County Council)Sedgeford Neighbourhood Plan (Kings Lynn & West Norfolk District Council)Sid Valley Neighbourhood Plan (Sidmo…

Essential reading for Neighbourhood Planners

Through my site I have attempted to explain the neighbourhood planning process, and provide regular blog posts on the latest issues affecting neighbourhood planning. But where can you go to find out more?

In this article I attempt to summarise where you should go for the most useful information and guidance, and where you can find funding and support for writing a Neighbourhood Plan.
Locality Toolkits and Guidance Locality administer the government's current programme of support for neighbourhood planning groups, and Locality's site should be your first port of call when writing a Neighbourhood Plan.
Locality has produced an excellent series of 'toolkits & guidance' on a range of issues to assist the preparation of neighbourhood plans. It is difficult to understate how valuable Locality's guides are for budding neighbourhood planners. Be sure you don't miss: The Neighbourhood Plans Roadmap 2018 by Dave …

Secretary of State overturns Planning Inspector's decision due to density concerns

Normally, planning appeals are determined by Planning Inspectors, but in some circumstances appeals may be 'recovered' for determination by the Secretary of State (SoS). The current SoS for Housing, Communities and Local Government is James Brokenshire MP.

In December 2018, the SoS issued a decision on a recovered appeal at Woburn Sands, Buckinghamshire. The proposal for residential development of up to 203 dwellings, a doctor’s surgery, open space and landscaping, together with pedestrian, cycle and vehicular access, was initially refused by Milton Keynes Council, and following appeal, granted permission by a Planning Inspector. However, the SoS recovered the appeal and overturned the Inspector's decision, dismissing the appeal.

Details of the case are available on the Planning Inspectorate's website, using case reference: APP/Y0435/W/17/3169314.
Appeal site & Neighbourhood Plan The appeal site is a 15.2 hectare, greenfield site, located outside the development bo…