Skip to main content

Appeal rejected due to loss of open space: East Langton Neighbourhood Plan

Appeal dismissed due to concerns over loss of open space
A recent appeal for 5 dwellings has been rejected by a Planning Inspector, in part, due to conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan - despite a Local Green Space designation having been removed during examination.

The development proposal, for the erection of 5 dwellings and children’s play area with associated vehicular access at land rear of the Hanbury Centre, Stonton Road, Church Langton LE16 7SZ, was initially refused outline planning permission by Harborough District Council. The subsequent appeal was dismissed by a Planning Inspector, see appeal reference: APP/F2415/W/18/3212873.

Relevant to this appeal is the East Langton Neighbourhood Plan (ELNP), which was formally made by Harborough District Council in June 2018.

Impact on open space, sport and recreation

In assessing the scheme, the Planning Inspector's main concern was that the development would lead to the loss of an open space used for sports and recreation.

The ELNP seeks to retain the appeal site as an open space, indicating the site on a map and describing it as a "Site of environmental and community significance, including Open Space, Sport & Recreation sites".

Local Green Space status

Where an open space satisfies certain criteria, Neighbourhood Plans can designate the open space as a 'Local Green Space'. This designation gives open spaces protection from development akin to 'Green Belt' policy.

The criteria which an open space must satisfy to qualify for Local Green Space designation are set out in paragraph 100 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Whilst the ELNP notes the significance of the appeal site to the local community for its recreational value, the site is not designated as a Local Green Space (LGS).

The submission version of the ELNP did in fact propose the site for LGS designation. However in his Report the Neighbourhood Plan Examiner concluded that whilst the site is an 'attractive green area', it does not satisfy the national policy criteria of being 'demonstrably special...'.

The Neighbourhood Plan Examiner also noted the 'sustainable location' of the open space, concluding:

I must consider whether its designation as an LGS might prevent the making of the Plan from contributing to the achievement of sustainable development.

This implies that the site's future development potential is somehow relevant to considering whether the site should be designated as LGS. The NPPF's criteria for designating LGS's do not require the assessment of a site's future development potential - rather it is an assessment of the open space's value to the community it serves at present.

The basic conditions require a neighbourhood plan as a whole to "contribute to the achievement of sustainable development". However it is unclear how the designation of one modest open space as a LGS would undermine the whole plan's contribution to delivering sustainable development.

Planning balance

At the time of the planning appeal, Harborough District could (and presumably still can) demonstrate in excess of a Five Year Supply of Housing Land - in other words, it has sufficient land supply to meet its housing needs in the short term. The NPPF's 'tilted balance' under the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not therefore apply in this case.

The site is located outside the defined Development Boundary which, the Inspector notes, is contrary to strategic policies in the district's Core Strategy.

In his Decision Letter, the Inspector makes reference to national policy which states that existing open space, sports and recreational buildings and land should not be built on unless clearly surplus to requirements, or their replacement would be at least equal in quantity and quality.

The Inspector noted the ELNP's aspiration to retain the site for open space, sport and recreation, and perhaps takes a more sympathetic view than the Neighbourhood Plan Examiner, concluding that any future development potential is 'not significant at this time' and, 'since there will be periodic reviews and monitoring through the development plan process, if there should be a shortfall it will be appropriately addressed in the future'. In other words, a future review of the ELNP can consider whether the site should be retained in its current use, or should be allocated for development.

During the appeal local people clearly expressed their concerns regarding the potential loss of open space, along with evidence presented by the district council, leading the Inspector to note:

I have found from the evidence before me that the OSSR [open space, sport, recreation] site off Old School Walk is much valued by local people with strong opposition to it being taken away.

Ultimately, the Inspector concluded the proposal does not conform with the ELNP, certain strategic policies of the Core Strategy, and National Policy which seeks to protect open spaces for sport and recreation.

Importance of evidence

Through the appeal it was demonstrated that the appeal site is of particular local significance to the local community due to the site's recreational value. It is therefore regrettable that, during the examination process, the Neighbourhood Plan Examiner recommended the proposed Local Green Space designation be removed from the site.

The appeal process is lengthy and costly, and in this case will likely have caused a good deal of upset for the local community who faced the threat of losing a valued open space.

If the site had been designated as an LGS in the ELNP, the outcome would have been the same, the site would remain unsuitable for development - without requiring the expense of a planning appeal to determine this fact.

The ELNP was accompanied by a clear assessment of open spaces, and perhaps there was nothing more the ELNP could have done to convince the examiner the site should be designated.

However, it was the culmination of various evidence sources which led the Inspector to determine the site's recreational value. When making Local Green Space designations, it is essential that Neighbourhood Plans are accompanied by an assessment which demonstrates that the open space satisfies the NPPF's criteria. Crucially, this should contain clear evidence to demonstrate the open space is of 'particular local significance' to the community it serves. Local Green Spaces are a powerful tool, and consequently should be supported by robust evidence.

Locality has recently published a very helpful toolkit for making Local Green Space designations which explains the types of evidence that can be used as justification.


Popular posts from this blog

Housing Delivery Test 2019 Results Published

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has now published the latest results of its Housing Delivery Test (HDT), based on the number of new homes built in the period 2016 to 2019.

The HDT 2019 measurement for each council area is provided in the searchable table below.
How the Housing Delivery Test is calculated The HDT calculates the number of new homes built, as a percentage of the number of homes needed over the past three years. MHCLG re-calculates an HDT figure annually for every council area in England. The new 2019 measurement replaces the previous 2018 measurement.
Consequences of the Housing Delivery Test The purpose of the HDT is to hold local authorities to account over the supply of new housing.

Where the HDT shows the delivery of new homes has fallen below 95% of the district or borough's housing requirement over the previous three years, the council should prepare an Action Plan to assess the causes of under-delivery and identify actions to…

Why the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan failed

News that the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan was rejected at referendum has spread rapidly across social media and has even been picked up by local and national press - see BBC article.

The story has garnered a lot of attention as it is highly unusual for a Neighbourhood Plan to be rejected. The Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan is only the third Neighbourhood Plan not to be supported by residents.

At the referendum held on 14 March 2019, the Neighbourhood Plan was rejected, albeit by a very slim margin of just 22 votes.
'No' Campaign Prior to the referendum, Labour town councillors led a campaign which encouraged local people to vote against the Neighbourhood Plan. 
Based on the literature shared by the campaign group, opposition to the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan appears to be pointed at three key issues: Impacts on the town and its infrastructure of the overall scale of growth Middlewich is expected deliverDisagreement with the individual sites identified by the Neighbourhood …

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans made in July 2019

Neighbourhood Plans provide a bespoke planning framework for the local area. No two plans are alike, although many have similar characteristics and address common themes. This post provides a short summary of those Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in July 2019, highlighting the elements which make each plan locally specific and unique.

The purpose of this post is to celebrate the achievement of those communities in successfully preparing their Neighbourhood Plans, and to share the interesting ideas and policies for the benefit of others who are currently writing their plans. Links to the Neighbourhood Plans are provided throughout the post.
Navigate this post using the map July was a busy month, with a whopping 24 Neighbourhood Plans successfully passing referendum. To  make it easier to navigate this post, the location of the areas covered by each new Neighbourhood Plan are shown on the interactive map. Click on a marker to reveal a link to the plan's su…

How the Housing Delivery Test can affect Neighbourhood Plans

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has today published the results of the Housing Delivery Test (HDT).

**NEW - try my Housing Delivery Test Checker tool to see results for your area**

The HDT was first mooted by the Housing White Paper, back in February 2017. The HDT calculates the number of new homes built, as a percentage of the number of homes needed over the past three years. MHCLG has published a HDT figure for every council area in England, and indicates it will re-calculate the HDT annually.

The purpose of the HDT is to hold local authorities to account over the supply of new housing.

Where the HDT shows the delivery of new homes has fallen below 95% of the district or borough's housing requirement over the previous three years, the council should prepare an Action Plan to assess the causes of under-delivery and identify actions to increase delivery in future years.

Where the HDT shows a district's housing delivery is less than 85%, the c…

Review of Planning Appeal: The tricky task of planning for housing development - Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan

I previously posted about why it is important to include policies and site allocations for housing, in order to "presumption-proof" your Neighbourhood Plan. A recent planning appeal (APP/R1038/W/17/3192255), which resulted in the granting of planning permission for 180 homes at Wingerworth, Derbyshire, illustrates the importance of making provision for housing development in a Neighbourhood Plan.

North East Derbyshire Council ranks settlements in a hierarchy. Wingerworth is located firmly in the middle of the hierarchy as a "Settlement with good levels of sustainability", so presumably has some merits as a location for housing development.

The Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan (WNP) successfully passed the referendum stage in June 2018. The WNP includes a number of policies which relate to the provision of housing development, for example:

Policy W1 defines a settlement development limit around the built area of Wingerworth village, offering in principle support to de…

Conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan & how to provide certainty on the location of development

Recently I wrote about two appeal decisions where planning permission was granted for housing development, despite the sites not being identified for development within the respective Neighbourhood Plans for the area. See Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire and Review of Planning Appeal: The tricky task of planning for housing development (Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan).

These examples, and other similar cases, raise a wider question about what constitutes 'conflict' with a Neighbourhood Plan.
A recent High Court ruling, issued in September 2018, has 'tested' this issue. The claim was lodged by Chichester District Council (CDC) against the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, and Beechcroft Ltd. The High Court decision is available to view on the BAILII website.
In this post, I have summarised the appeal decision and High Court decision, and conclude by offering some advice to ensure your Neighbourhood Plan p…

Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire

An appeal decision initially caught my eye due to its surprising interpretation of 'infill development' -  but also raises some concerning issues around how Neighbourhood Plan policies are applied during the decision-making process.

The appeal relates to an application for the construction of up to 140 dwellings, new public open space, associated landscaping and site infrastructure on a 3.9ha site at Chinnor, Oxfordshire. The application was made by Persimmon Homes and initially refused by South Oxfordshire District Council. The appeal was allowed, meaning the Planning Inspector went against the district council's decision grant planning permission for the scheme. Details of the appeal can be found using the following reference APP/Q3115/W/17/3187058. Neighbourhood Plan & Development Plan Chinnor is a large village in Oxfordshire. The Chinnor Neighbourhood Plan (CNP) was 'made' in October 2017. When the appeal commenced, the Neighbourhood Plan was less than one…

Appeal granted in countryside despite Five Year Land Supply - Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan

Through a recent appeal decision, a Planning Inspector has granted outline planning permission for up to 55 dwellings and 'Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace' (SANG) at land at Parklands, east of Basingstoke Road, Spencers Wood, Wokingham.

The decision was issued on 28th February 2019, under appeal reference APP/X0360/W/18/3204133.

The appeal site is located between two villages, Three Mile Cross and Spencers Wood. The scheme proposes two areas of development adjoining each of the villages, separated by an area of open space - a 'SANG'.
Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan The Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) was made in February 2017. Policy 1 of the SNP addresses the location of development:

In Shinfield Parish, development within the Development Limits..., will be supported; development adjacent to the Development Limits will only be supported where the benefits of the development outweigh its adverse impacts. 

'Development limits' are a very common planning …

The Neighbourhood Plan 'League Table'

My last blog post, 1,000th Neighbourhood Plan marks continued growth of neighbourhood planning, illustrates the growth of Neighbourhood Plans over recent years.

Exploring the data further, this blog post breaks down the total number of approved plans by Local Planning Authority area. Presenting the data in this way highlights the marked differences in the take up of neighbourhood planning in different areas. About the dataThe table (below) has been populated using data from my Planfinder app, and is based on the same dataset used in my 1,000th Neighbourhood Plan... blog post. The data includes plans which successfully passed referendum before the end of February 2020, therefore any plans which passed referendum over the past couple of weeks are not included - although you can find details of these on the Planfinder app.

The sum total of the number of approved plans shown in the table exceeds 1,000, as a small number of plans cross local planning authority boundaries and are therefore…

Need for homes trumps valued landscapes. Review of appeal decision: Farnham Neighbourhood Plan

An appeal decision at land west of Folly Hill, Folly Hill, Farnham (appeal reference: APP/R3650/W/17/3171409) illustrates the delicate and complex issue of determining whether a Neighbourhood Plan is or is not 'out-of-date' and the effect this has on applying the 'tilted balance'.

The appeal decision was issued in December 2018, granting planning permission for 96 dwellings, including 38 affordable, with areas of open space, Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANGS); children’s play area; SuDS attenuation; highway works and a new access. 
The appeal site is located within the Borough of Waverley, Surrey, and the Farnham Neighbourhood Area. Development Plan The Farnham Neighbourhood Plan (FNP) was made in July 2017, and was therefore less than a year and a half old at the time the decision was issued.
During the course of the appeal, the Waverley Local Plan Part 1 (WLPP1) was adopted. This is, in effect, 'half' of a Local Plan setting out strategic polici…