Skip to main content

Need for homes trumps valued landscapes. Review of appeal decision: Farnham Neighbourhood Plan

Neighbourhood Plan, landscape, Planning Appeal
An appeal decision at land west of Folly Hill, Folly Hill, Farnham (appeal reference: APP/R3650/W/17/3171409) illustrates the delicate and complex issue of determining whether a Neighbourhood Plan is or is not 'out-of-date' and the effect this has on applying the 'tilted balance'.

The appeal decision was issued in December 2018, granting planning permission for 96 dwellings, including 38 affordable, with areas of open space, Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANGS); children’s play area; SuDS attenuation; highway works and a new access. 

The appeal site is located within the Borough of Waverley, Surrey, and the Farnham Neighbourhood Area.

Development Plan

The Farnham Neighbourhood Plan (FNP) was made in July 2017, and was therefore less than a year and a half old at the time the decision was issued.

During the course of the appeal, the Waverley Local Plan Part 1 (WLPP1) was adopted. This is, in effect, 'half' of a Local Plan setting out strategic policies and strategic sites for growth. Other site allocations and policies for managing development will be set out in the Part 2 Local Plan, which has not yet been adopted.

Characteristics of the site

The appeal site is located within an 'Area of Great Landscape Value' which is protected from development by a number of policies, both for its own value and due to the site providing a 'buffer' to an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).

One of the main issues explored by the Inspector was the visual impact of the proposal on the landscape and character of the locality. In addition, the Inspector explored other concerns regarding the site's sustainability, such as its topography, proximity to services and facilities, and suitability for pedestrians and cyclists.

Neighbourhood Plan

The FNP (through policy FNP1) supports new development within the built area of Farnham, subject to it meeting a range of criteria, relating to design, heritage and landscape character, etc. The FNP allocates a number of development sites and expects to deliver in excess of 1,400 dwellings over the plan period.

The appeal site lies outside the defined built-up area boundary within the FNP and is not allocated for development. The FNP limits development in the countryside, permitting development only where, it retains landscape value and historic character, offering particular protection in the 'Old Park' area, where the appeal site is located. In addition the FNP seeks to protects the distinct identity of Farnham by preventing coalescence between settlements.

The WLPP1 was adopted after the FNP was made. The WLPP1 requires an additional 450 homes be allocated in Farnham up to 2032. In response, Farnham Town Council has commenced a partial review of the FNP.

Inspector's Decision

Following the WLPP1 identifying a requirement for additional dwellings in Farnham, the FNP does not meet the areas housing needs in full. The Inspector concurred with an Inspector from another recent appeal in the area - that the FNP not meeting the area's housing need is a 'neutral matter', but is not necessarily 'out-of-date'. However, the Inspector also concurred that the relevant policies in the FNP cannot carry full weight as the settlement boundary is likely to have to be adjusted to accommodate the extra homes required by the WLPP1.

The WLPP1 and FNP are not in themselves out-of-date, as it is clear how the extra development sites will be found - through preparation of the Local Plan Part 2 (WLPP2).

Despite noting the proposal's 'transformative impacts', the Inspector concluded that the degree of change resulting from the development would not result in adverse harm to the character and appearance of the area. As such, there would be no material conflict with the development plan taken as a whole. 

The Inspector noted the specific benefits of the scheme, namely the provision of market housing at a time when the emerging plan Local Plan (Part 2) needs to secure a further 450 more homes for Farnham than set out in the FNP. Any possible conflicts with the development plan are, on balance, outweighed by the material considerations of the benefits of the scheme.

Despite recognising the progress being made on 'WLPP2' and partial review of the FNP, the Inspector concluded that 'progress on future plan-making does not provide a reason for not positively considering the proposals now'.

What the decision means

The FNP is a well-presented and comprehensive plan, which makes provision for significant growth. The housing requirement increased following preparation of the 'part 1' Local Plan. However, in the absence of the 'part 2' Local Plan, the Development Plan does not allocate enough sites - leading the Inspector to place great weight on the benefits of the appeal site in providing additional housing.

I suspect the Town Council may have reasonably expected the plan to provide a bit more longevity, before it needed to embark on its review. The case shows the effect a Local Plan review can have on existing Neighbourhood Plans. As such, Neighbourhood Plans may also need to be reviewed regularly, especially in areas with high growth needs.

This case has similarities to others I have discussed previously. On face value, the proposal appears to directly conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan, but following interrogation by a Planning Inspector, no conflict was found and the degree of harm arising from the scheme is outweighed by the benefit of increasing a supply of housing.

National policy offers some extra 'protection' against proposals which conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan, in circumstances where the 'tilted balance' of the presumption in favour of sustainable development is applied. However in cases such as this appeal, where no conflict is found to have occurred and the development plan isn't considered to be out-of-date - such 'protection' will not apply.


Popular posts from this blog

Housing Delivery Test 2019 Results Published

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has now published the latest results of its Housing Delivery Test (HDT), based on the number of new homes built in the period 2016 to 2019.

The HDT 2019 measurement for each council area is provided in the searchable table below.
How the Housing Delivery Test is calculated The HDT calculates the number of new homes built, as a percentage of the number of homes needed over the past three years. MHCLG re-calculates an HDT figure annually for every council area in England. The new 2019 measurement replaces the previous 2018 measurement.
Consequences of the Housing Delivery Test The purpose of the HDT is to hold local authorities to account over the supply of new housing.

Where the HDT shows the delivery of new homes has fallen below 95% of the district or borough's housing requirement over the previous three years, the council should prepare an Action Plan to assess the causes of under-delivery and identify actions to…

Why the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan failed

News that the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan was rejected at referendum has spread rapidly across social media and has even been picked up by local and national press - see BBC article.

The story has garnered a lot of attention as it is highly unusual for a Neighbourhood Plan to be rejected. The Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan is only the third Neighbourhood Plan not to be supported by residents.

At the referendum held on 14 March 2019, the Neighbourhood Plan was rejected, albeit by a very slim margin of just 22 votes.
'No' Campaign Prior to the referendum, Labour town councillors led a campaign which encouraged local people to vote against the Neighbourhood Plan. 
Based on the literature shared by the campaign group, opposition to the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan appears to be pointed at three key issues: Impacts on the town and its infrastructure of the overall scale of growth Middlewich is expected deliverDisagreement with the individual sites identified by the Neighbourhood …

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans made in July 2019

Neighbourhood Plans provide a bespoke planning framework for the local area. No two plans are alike, although many have similar characteristics and address common themes. This post provides a short summary of those Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in July 2019, highlighting the elements which make each plan locally specific and unique.

The purpose of this post is to celebrate the achievement of those communities in successfully preparing their Neighbourhood Plans, and to share the interesting ideas and policies for the benefit of others who are currently writing their plans. Links to the Neighbourhood Plans are provided throughout the post.
Navigate this post using the map July was a busy month, with a whopping 24 Neighbourhood Plans successfully passing referendum. To  make it easier to navigate this post, the location of the areas covered by each new Neighbourhood Plan are shown on the interactive map. Click on a marker to reveal a link to the plan's su…

How the Housing Delivery Test can affect Neighbourhood Plans

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has today published the results of the Housing Delivery Test (HDT).

**NEW - try my Housing Delivery Test Checker tool to see results for your area**

The HDT was first mooted by the Housing White Paper, back in February 2017. The HDT calculates the number of new homes built, as a percentage of the number of homes needed over the past three years. MHCLG has published a HDT figure for every council area in England, and indicates it will re-calculate the HDT annually.

The purpose of the HDT is to hold local authorities to account over the supply of new housing.

Where the HDT shows the delivery of new homes has fallen below 95% of the district or borough's housing requirement over the previous three years, the council should prepare an Action Plan to assess the causes of under-delivery and identify actions to increase delivery in future years.

Where the HDT shows a district's housing delivery is less than 85%, the c…

Review of Planning Appeal: The tricky task of planning for housing development - Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan

I previously posted about why it is important to include policies and site allocations for housing, in order to "presumption-proof" your Neighbourhood Plan. A recent planning appeal (APP/R1038/W/17/3192255), which resulted in the granting of planning permission for 180 homes at Wingerworth, Derbyshire, illustrates the importance of making provision for housing development in a Neighbourhood Plan.

North East Derbyshire Council ranks settlements in a hierarchy. Wingerworth is located firmly in the middle of the hierarchy as a "Settlement with good levels of sustainability", so presumably has some merits as a location for housing development.

The Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan (WNP) successfully passed the referendum stage in June 2018. The WNP includes a number of policies which relate to the provision of housing development, for example:

Policy W1 defines a settlement development limit around the built area of Wingerworth village, offering in principle support to de…

Appeal granted in countryside despite Five Year Land Supply - Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan

Through a recent appeal decision, a Planning Inspector has granted outline planning permission for up to 55 dwellings and 'Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace' (SANG) at land at Parklands, east of Basingstoke Road, Spencers Wood, Wokingham.

The decision was issued on 28th February 2019, under appeal reference APP/X0360/W/18/3204133.

The appeal site is located between two villages, Three Mile Cross and Spencers Wood. The scheme proposes two areas of development adjoining each of the villages, separated by an area of open space - a 'SANG'.
Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan The Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) was made in February 2017. Policy 1 of the SNP addresses the location of development:

In Shinfield Parish, development within the Development Limits..., will be supported; development adjacent to the Development Limits will only be supported where the benefits of the development outweigh its adverse impacts. 

'Development limits' are a very common planning …

Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire

An appeal decision initially caught my eye due to its surprising interpretation of 'infill development' -  but also raises some concerning issues around how Neighbourhood Plan policies are applied during the decision-making process.

The appeal relates to an application for the construction of up to 140 dwellings, new public open space, associated landscaping and site infrastructure on a 3.9ha site at Chinnor, Oxfordshire. The application was made by Persimmon Homes and initially refused by South Oxfordshire District Council. The appeal was allowed, meaning the Planning Inspector went against the district council's decision grant planning permission for the scheme. Details of the appeal can be found using the following reference APP/Q3115/W/17/3187058. Neighbourhood Plan & Development Plan Chinnor is a large village in Oxfordshire. The Chinnor Neighbourhood Plan (CNP) was 'made' in October 2017. When the appeal commenced, the Neighbourhood Plan was less than one…

Appeal rejected due to loss of open space: East Langton Neighbourhood Plan

A recent appeal for 5 dwellings has been rejected by a Planning Inspector, in part, due to conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan - despite a Local Green Space designation having been removed during examination.

The development proposal, for the erection of 5 dwellings and children’s play area with associated vehicular access at land rear of the Hanbury Centre, Stonton Road, Church Langton LE16 7SZ, was initially refused outline planning permission by Harborough District Council. The subsequent appeal was dismissed by a Planning Inspector, see appeal reference: APP/F2415/W/18/3212873.

Relevant to this appeal is the East Langton Neighbourhood Plan (ELNP), which was formally made by Harborough District Council in June 2018.
Impact on open space, sport and recreation In assessing the scheme, the Planning Inspector's main concern was that the development would lead to the loss of an open space used for sports and recreation.

The ELNP seeks to retain the appeal site as an open space, indi…

Conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan & how to provide certainty on the location of development

Recently I wrote about two appeal decisions where planning permission was granted for housing development, despite the sites not being identified for development within the respective Neighbourhood Plans for the area. See Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire and Review of Planning Appeal: The tricky task of planning for housing development (Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan).

These examples, and other similar cases, raise a wider question about what constitutes 'conflict' with a Neighbourhood Plan.
A recent High Court ruling, issued in September 2018, has 'tested' this issue. The claim was lodged by Chichester District Council (CDC) against the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, and Beechcroft Ltd. The High Court decision is available to view on the BAILII website.
In this post, I have summarised the appeal decision and High Court decision, and conclude by offering some advice to ensure your Neighbourhood Plan p…

1,000th Neighbourhood Plan marks continued growth of neighbourhood planning

February 2020 saw an important milestone achieved, with the total number of approved Neighbourhood Plans reaching 1,000.
About the Planfinder data All Things Neighbourhood Planning's Planfinder app provides the data source for this blog post.

The Planfinder is a database of all Neighbourhood Plans which have successfully passed referendum. The Planfinder is maintained and updated regularly from ATNP's own research and monitoring of Neighbourhood Plan progress.

Joint Neighbourhood Plans (i.e. covering multiple parishes) and Neighbourhood Plans crossing a local authority boundary (i.e. forming part of the development plan in multiple local authority areas), are counted only once.

The Neighbourhood Plan data described in this post also includes Neighbourhood Development Orders and Community Right to Build Orders, as these are closely related to Neighbourhood Plans, follow a similar process in their preparation, and also fall under the 'umbrella' term of neighbourhood pla…