Skip to main content

Need for homes trumps valued landscapes. Review of appeal decision: Farnham Neighbourhood Plan

Neighbourhood Plan, landscape, Planning Appeal
An appeal decision at land west of Folly Hill, Folly Hill, Farnham (appeal reference: APP/R3650/W/17/3171409) illustrates the delicate and complex issue of determining whether a Neighbourhood Plan is or is not 'out-of-date' and the effect this has on applying the 'tilted balance'.

The appeal decision was issued in December 2018, granting planning permission for 96 dwellings, including 38 affordable, with areas of open space, Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANGS); children’s play area; SuDS attenuation; highway works and a new access. 

The appeal site is located within the Borough of Waverley, Surrey, and the Farnham Neighbourhood Area.

Development Plan

The Farnham Neighbourhood Plan (FNP) was made in July 2017, and was therefore less than a year and a half old at the time the decision was issued.

During the course of the appeal, the Waverley Local Plan Part 1 (WLPP1) was adopted. This is, in effect, 'half' of a Local Plan setting out strategic policies and strategic sites for growth. Other site allocations and policies for managing development will be set out in the Part 2 Local Plan, which has not yet been adopted.

Characteristics of the site

The appeal site is located within an 'Area of Great Landscape Value' which is protected from development by a number of policies, both for its own value and due to the site providing a 'buffer' to an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).

One of the main issues explored by the Inspector was the visual impact of the proposal on the landscape and character of the locality. In addition, the Inspector explored other concerns regarding the site's sustainability, such as its topography, proximity to services and facilities, and suitability for pedestrians and cyclists.

Neighbourhood Plan

The FNP (through policy FNP1) supports new development within the built area of Farnham, subject to it meeting a range of criteria, relating to design, heritage and landscape character, etc. The FNP allocates a number of development sites and expects to deliver in excess of 1,400 dwellings over the plan period.

The appeal site lies outside the defined built-up area boundary within the FNP and is not allocated for development. The FNP limits development in the countryside, permitting development only where, it retains landscape value and historic character, offering particular protection in the 'Old Park' area, where the appeal site is located. In addition the FNP seeks to protects the distinct identity of Farnham by preventing coalescence between settlements.

The WLPP1 was adopted after the FNP was made. The WLPP1 requires an additional 450 homes be allocated in Farnham up to 2032. In response, Farnham Town Council has commenced a partial review of the FNP.

Inspector's Decision

Following the WLPP1 identifying a requirement for additional dwellings in Farnham, the FNP does not meet the areas housing needs in full. The Inspector concurred with an Inspector from another recent appeal in the area - that the FNP not meeting the area's housing need is a 'neutral matter', but is not necessarily 'out-of-date'. However, the Inspector also concurred that the relevant policies in the FNP cannot carry full weight as the settlement boundary is likely to have to be adjusted to accommodate the extra homes required by the WLPP1.

The WLPP1 and FNP are not in themselves out-of-date, as it is clear how the extra development sites will be found - through preparation of the Local Plan Part 2 (WLPP2).

Despite noting the proposal's 'transformative impacts', the Inspector concluded that the degree of change resulting from the development would not result in adverse harm to the character and appearance of the area. As such, there would be no material conflict with the development plan taken as a whole. 

The Inspector noted the specific benefits of the scheme, namely the provision of market housing at a time when the emerging plan Local Plan (Part 2) needs to secure a further 450 more homes for Farnham than set out in the FNP. Any possible conflicts with the development plan are, on balance, outweighed by the material considerations of the benefits of the scheme.

Despite recognising the progress being made on 'WLPP2' and partial review of the FNP, the Inspector concluded that 'progress on future plan-making does not provide a reason for not positively considering the proposals now'.

What the decision means

The FNP is a well-presented and comprehensive plan, which makes provision for significant growth. The housing requirement increased following preparation of the 'part 1' Local Plan. However, in the absence of the 'part 2' Local Plan, the Development Plan does not allocate enough sites - leading the Inspector to place great weight on the benefits of the appeal site in providing additional housing.

I suspect the Town Council may have reasonably expected the plan to provide a bit more longevity, before it needed to embark on its review. The case shows the effect a Local Plan review can have on existing Neighbourhood Plans. As such, Neighbourhood Plans may also need to be reviewed regularly, especially in areas with high growth needs.

This case has similarities to others I have discussed previously. On face value, the proposal appears to directly conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan, but following interrogation by a Planning Inspector, no conflict was found and the degree of harm arising from the scheme is outweighed by the benefit of increasing a supply of housing.

National policy offers some extra 'protection' against proposals which conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan, in circumstances where the 'tilted balance' of the presumption in favour of sustainable development is applied. However in cases such as this appeal, where no conflict is found to have occurred and the development plan isn't considered to be out-of-date - such 'protection' will not apply.


Popular posts from this blog

Why the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan failed

News that the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan was rejected at referendum has spread rapidly across social media and has even been picked up by local and national press - see BBC article.

The story has garnered a lot of attention as it is highly unusual for a Neighbourhood Plan to be rejected. The Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan is only the third Neighbourhood Plan not to be supported by residents.

At the referendum held on 14 March 2019, the Neighbourhood Plan was rejected, albeit by a very slim margin of just 22 votes.
'No' Campaign Prior to the referendum, Labour town councillors led a campaign which encouraged local people to vote against the Neighbourhood Plan. 
Based on the literature shared by the campaign group, opposition to the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan appears to be pointed at three key issues: Impacts on the town and its infrastructure of the overall scale of growth Middlewich is expected deliverDisagreement with the individual sites identified by the Neighbourhood …

Latest stats show continued increase in house-building

Chart: All Things Neighbourhood Planning
Data source: Live tables on housebuilding: new build dwellings (Table 209), MHCLG

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government has today published its latest data on house building in the United Kingdom. The graph shows the number of dwellings completed by financial year in England. Data is also available for the other home nations. However, Neighbourhood Planning is a feature of the English planning system only.

In 2017/18, there were more than 160,500 new homes constructed. - the highest rate of development since the financial crisis of 2007-08. As illustrated in the graph, the data shows a steady increase in number of homes built each year since the low-point of 2012-13, where less than 108,000 homes were built. 

The rate of development in 2017/18 is comparable to the period 2004 - 2006. Assuming this trend of increasing development rates continues into the current financial year, the number of homes constructed in 2018/19 could po…

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans made in July 2019

Neighbourhood Plans provide a bespoke planning framework for the local area. No two plans are alike, although many have similar characteristics and address common themes. This post provides a short summary of those Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in July 2019, highlighting the elements which make each plan locally specific and unique.

The purpose of this post is to celebrate the achievement of those communities in successfully preparing their Neighbourhood Plans, and to share the interesting ideas and policies for the benefit of others who are currently writing their plans. Links to the Neighbourhood Plans are provided throughout the post.
Navigate this post using the map July was a busy month, with a whopping 24 Neighbourhood Plans successfully passing referendum. To  make it easier to navigate this post, the location of the areas covered by each new Neighbourhood Plan are shown on the interactive map. Click on a marker to reveal a link to the plan's su…

Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire

An appeal decision initially caught my eye due to its surprising interpretation of 'infill development' -  but also raises some concerning issues around how Neighbourhood Plan policies are applied during the decision-making process.

The appeal relates to an application for the construction of up to 140 dwellings, new public open space, associated landscaping and site infrastructure on a 3.9ha site at Chinnor, Oxfordshire. The application was made by Persimmon Homes and initially refused by South Oxfordshire District Council. The appeal was allowed, meaning the Planning Inspector went against the district council's decision grant planning permission for the scheme. Details of the appeal can be found using the following reference APP/Q3115/W/17/3187058. Neighbourhood Plan & Development Plan Chinnor is a large village in Oxfordshire. The Chinnor Neighbourhood Plan (CNP) was 'made' in October 2017. When the appeal commenced, the Neighbourhood Plan was less than one…

Putting Health & Wellbeing at the Heart of Neighbourhood Planning

The planning system's origins can be traced back to public health policies from the nineteenth century. Increases in population and the growth of towns created public health problems, and early legislation focused on creating sanitary conditions.

There is a sense that in recent decades planning has lost its way with health, yet our modern environments continue to have profound effects on our health and well-being. In the blog post What stops us from creating healthier places? author Rachel Toms notes that overall, the planning system has done a good job of designing infectious diseases out of the places in which people live, but has "inadvertently contributed to sedentary lifestyles, mental distress and social isolation".

Whilst the planning system has cured the public health problems of the industrial revolution, it faces a new set of public health challenges for the modern era.

In this post, I make the case for prioritising health and wellbeing through Neighbourhood P…

Appeal granted in countryside despite Five Year Land Supply - Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan

Through a recent appeal decision, a Planning Inspector has granted outline planning permission for up to 55 dwellings and 'Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace' (SANG) at land at Parklands, east of Basingstoke Road, Spencers Wood, Wokingham.

The decision was issued on 28th February 2019, under appeal reference APP/X0360/W/18/3204133.

The appeal site is located between two villages, Three Mile Cross and Spencers Wood. The scheme proposes two areas of development adjoining each of the villages, separated by an area of open space - a 'SANG'.
Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan The Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) was made in February 2017. Policy 1 of the SNP addresses the location of development:

In Shinfield Parish, development within the Development Limits..., will be supported; development adjacent to the Development Limits will only be supported where the benefits of the development outweigh its adverse impacts. 

'Development limits' are a very common planning …

Neighbourhood Planning and Community Health and Wellbeing - Briefing Note for NALC

I have teamed up with the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) to author a briefing note on Neighbourhood Planning and Community Health and Wellbeing.

The briefing note illustrates how Neighbourhood Plans can actively contribute to improving health and wellbeing in their communities, and draws on recent examples of neighbourhood plan policies. Neighbourhood Plans can tackle issues of health and wellbeing in lots of different ways, as explained in the briefing note, and is something I will be making the case for in future blog posts.

A pdf version of the briefing note is available to view and download below. Further advice on neighbourhood planning is also available from NALC's website.

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans Made in September 2019

This post explores Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in September 2019, highlighting elements which make each plan locally specific and unique. The following Neighbourhood Plans passed referendum in September 2019:
Bawtry Neighbourhood Plan (Doncaster Council)Brackenfield Neighbourhood Plan (North East Derbyshire District Council)Chelford Neighbourhood Plan (Cheshire East Council)Congresbury Neighbourhood Plan (North Somerset Council)Glentworth Neighbourhood Plan (West Lindsey District Council)Hanslope Neighbourhood Plan (Milton Keynes Council)Hullavington Neighbourhood Plan (Wiltshire Council)Huntingdon Neighbourhood Plan (Huntingdonshire District Council)Misterton Neighbourhood Plan (Bassetlaw District Council)Moreton, Bobbingworth and the Lavers Neighbourhood Plan (Epping Forest District Council)Sedgefield Neighbourhood Plan (Durham County Council)Sedgeford Neighbourhood Plan (Kings Lynn & West Norfolk District Council)Sid Valley Neighbourhood Plan (Sidmo…

Essential reading for Neighbourhood Planners

Through my site I have attempted to explain the neighbourhood planning process, and provide regular blog posts on the latest issues affecting neighbourhood planning. But where can you go to find out more?

In this article I attempt to summarise where you should go for the most useful information and guidance, and where you can find funding and support for writing a Neighbourhood Plan.
Locality Toolkits and Guidance Locality administer the government's current programme of support for neighbourhood planning groups, and Locality's site should be your first port of call when writing a Neighbourhood Plan.
Locality has produced an excellent series of 'toolkits & guidance' on a range of issues to assist the preparation of neighbourhood plans. It is difficult to understate how valuable Locality's guides are for budding neighbourhood planners. Be sure you don't miss: The Neighbourhood Plans Roadmap 2018 by Dave …

Secretary of State overturns Planning Inspector's decision due to density concerns

Normally, planning appeals are determined by Planning Inspectors, but in some circumstances appeals may be 'recovered' for determination by the Secretary of State (SoS). The current SoS for Housing, Communities and Local Government is James Brokenshire MP.

In December 2018, the SoS issued a decision on a recovered appeal at Woburn Sands, Buckinghamshire. The proposal for residential development of up to 203 dwellings, a doctor’s surgery, open space and landscaping, together with pedestrian, cycle and vehicular access, was initially refused by Milton Keynes Council, and following appeal, granted permission by a Planning Inspector. However, the SoS recovered the appeal and overturned the Inspector's decision, dismissing the appeal.

Details of the case are available on the Planning Inspectorate's website, using case reference: APP/Y0435/W/17/3169314.
Appeal site & Neighbourhood Plan The appeal site is a 15.2 hectare, greenfield site, located outside the development bo…