Skip to main content

Linton Neighbourhood Plan: What scope does the Council have to modify a Neighbourhood Plan?

Neighbourhood Plan, what scope does local planning authority have to modify a Neighbourhood Plan
I was reviewing recent appeal decisions, and came across the case of the Linton Neighbourhood Plan. The plan had previously been subject to a legal challenge, which highlights the scope a local authority has in modifying a Neighbourhood Plan once it has been independently examined. Specifically, this article discusses the modifications set out in the Examiner's Report, following the Independent Examination and prior to the referendum - not substantive changes differing from the recommendations of the examiner, or undertaken at a different stage in the process.

Planning Appeal

In the appeal decision, a Planning Inspector has granted outline planning permission for 26 dwellings at Ridge Meadows, Northgate Lane / Tibgarth, Linton, West Yorkshire. The site is located within the area of Leeds City Council, and within the Linton Neighbourhood Area. The decision was issued on 14 December 2018, under appeal reference: APP/N4720/W/17/3186216.

In summary, Leeds City Council is unable to demonstrate a five year supply of housing land, meaning the Planning Inspector applied the 'tilted balance' - treating some policies as 'out-of-date' and testing whether the proposal will result in 'adverse harm'. You can read more about how you can make your Neighbourhood Plan resilient to the 'tilted balance' in my article "Presumption-proofing" Neighbourhood Plans.

The appeal site is located in an area which has been safeguarded for future development since 2001. In other words, reserved for future development, rather than being made available for development at present. The Planning Inspector considered a number of other issues relating to the sustainability of the site, including access to services and facilities, pedestrian safety, etc.

The Planning Inspector noted that the Linton Neighbourhood Plan (LNP) does not include any policy which restricts development of the site, meaning the scheme does not conflict with the LNP. You can read more about the issue of 'conflict' with a Neighbourhood Plan in my post Conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan & how to provide certainty on the location of development. Interestingly, the LNP does express its objection to development at 'The Ridge' - an issue I will return to later.

The appeal is quite unexceptional, and not altogether interesting for those of us involved in writing Neighbourhood Plans. However, what is perhaps more interesting is the Linton Neighbourhood Plan itself, and the challenge it previously faced through the courts.

Legal challenge on the Linton Neighbourhood Plan

When Collingham and Linton Parish Council submitted the draft LNP for independent examination, the draft LNP included a policy which, in essence, sought to restrict development of the appeal site (The Ridge) until a later time.

The Independent Examiner recommended the policy, and its associated supporting text, be deleted as the issue of development of The Ridge is a strategic matter under consideration of Leeds City Council, and is addressed by an existing policy which the LNP had simply re-stated. Leeds City Council amended the LNP and it proceeded to referendum. 

Kebbell Developments Ltd challenged the LNP in the High Court on claiming that Leeds City Council had, in modifying the plan, gone above and beyond the examiner's recommendations. 

Leeds City Council had deleted the offending policy and supporting text, but also inserted text which described a number of reasons why the appeal site was considered not suitable for development, including visual impact, traffic issues and access to facilities.

In addition, the LNP included a "Project Priorities List" - a list of projects and issues which reflects the community's aspirations for the area, but which is not in itself a planning policy. This list made reference to the now deleted policy, and therefore naturally needed to be corrected. However Leeds City Council retained text which expressed the Parish Council's aspiration to return the appeal site to Green Belt.

However, the challenge was rejected by the High Court in October 2016, and the verdict was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in March 2018.

The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) sets out the modifications which a local authority is permitted to make to a Neighbourhood Plan.  In his appeal decision, Lord Justice Lindblom identifies that the Act provides local authorities with "broad discretion in considering whether a particular modification is necessary for the purposes of satisfying the 'basic conditions'.
One must not adopt too narrow an understanding of the local planning authority's statutory power to make modifications 
Lord Justice Lindblom

The Act provides local authorities with the power to correct errors. Lord Justice Lindblom considers that this is not confined to the correction of "typographical mistakes and other minor infelicities", but includes amendments necessary to achieve accuracy and consistency in the wording of policies and their supporting text.

Whilst the examiner required the policy and supporting text to be deleted, he did not, conclude that the neighbourhood plan should avoid referring to the parish council's opinion on the development potential of the sites listed. By including the parish council's view (that The Ridge should be retained as Green Belt) in the Neighbourhood Plan will have some status when making planning decisions, despite this potentially contradicting with strategic matters of the Development Plan. Lord Justice Lindblom noted the issue, but concluded this is a matter to be resolved during the determination of a planning application.

The issue of the status of 'supporting text' contained in a Neighbourhood Plan is an interesting one and  a topic I will return to in a future post, no doubt. 

What we can learn

All Neighbourhood Plans, must be examined before they may proceed to a referendum in which people will vote on whether the plan should be 'made' by the local authority. For the vast majority of Neighbourhood Plans, the examiner will recommend some 'modifications' - specific changes to ensure the plan meets the 'basic conditions'. It is therefore very likely you will, at some point, have a conversation with your district or borough council about how your plan should be modified.

This Linton case should give some comfort that the local authority has broad discretion in modifying the plan. For example, where the examiner's modifications relating to subjects which are sensitive, you may want to think carefully about how the plan should be amended.

Perhaps the ruling may affect how examiner's make modifications. Why bother setting out detailed modifications if the local authority has the power to do something different? The examiner can simply describe how the plan should be modified, and leave it up to local authority and parish council to figure out precisely how this should be achieved.

Ultimately, how the plan is modified must address the examiner's concerns and give the local authority confidence that the plan meets the 'basic conditions'.

In the Linton case, Kebbell Developments were both the appellant in the planning appeal, and launched the legal challenge of the LNP. Clearly, Kebbell Developments has got what it wanted through the granting of the planning permission. It must have been quite an ordeal for the parish council and city council, to experience the LNP being challenged in the High Court - and is not what most people would expect to face when preparing a Neighbourhood Plan.

However, the case is helpful in that it confirms the broad powers that local planning authorities (i.e. district and borough councils) have to modify a plan. By working collaboratively with the local planning authority, this may help to ensure the community's 'voice' is retained in the Neighbourhood Plan.


Popular posts from this blog

Housing Delivery Test 2019 Results Published

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has now published the latest results of its Housing Delivery Test (HDT), based on the number of new homes built in the period 2016 to 2019.

The HDT 2019 measurement for each council area is provided in the searchable table below.
How the Housing Delivery Test is calculated The HDT calculates the number of new homes built, as a percentage of the number of homes needed over the past three years. MHCLG re-calculates an HDT figure annually for every council area in England. The new 2019 measurement replaces the previous 2018 measurement.
Consequences of the Housing Delivery Test The purpose of the HDT is to hold local authorities to account over the supply of new housing.

Where the HDT shows the delivery of new homes has fallen below 95% of the district or borough's housing requirement over the previous three years, the council should prepare an Action Plan to assess the causes of under-delivery and identify actions to…

Why the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan failed

News that the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan was rejected at referendum has spread rapidly across social media and has even been picked up by local and national press - see BBC article.

The story has garnered a lot of attention as it is highly unusual for a Neighbourhood Plan to be rejected. The Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan is only the third Neighbourhood Plan not to be supported by residents.

At the referendum held on 14 March 2019, the Neighbourhood Plan was rejected, albeit by a very slim margin of just 22 votes.
'No' Campaign Prior to the referendum, Labour town councillors led a campaign which encouraged local people to vote against the Neighbourhood Plan. 
Based on the literature shared by the campaign group, opposition to the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan appears to be pointed at three key issues: Impacts on the town and its infrastructure of the overall scale of growth Middlewich is expected deliverDisagreement with the individual sites identified by the Neighbourhood …

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans made in July 2019

Neighbourhood Plans provide a bespoke planning framework for the local area. No two plans are alike, although many have similar characteristics and address common themes. This post provides a short summary of those Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in July 2019, highlighting the elements which make each plan locally specific and unique.

The purpose of this post is to celebrate the achievement of those communities in successfully preparing their Neighbourhood Plans, and to share the interesting ideas and policies for the benefit of others who are currently writing their plans. Links to the Neighbourhood Plans are provided throughout the post.
Navigate this post using the map July was a busy month, with a whopping 24 Neighbourhood Plans successfully passing referendum. To  make it easier to navigate this post, the location of the areas covered by each new Neighbourhood Plan are shown on the interactive map. Click on a marker to reveal a link to the plan's su…

How the Housing Delivery Test can affect Neighbourhood Plans

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has today published the results of the Housing Delivery Test (HDT).

**NEW - try my Housing Delivery Test Checker tool to see results for your area**

The HDT was first mooted by the Housing White Paper, back in February 2017. The HDT calculates the number of new homes built, as a percentage of the number of homes needed over the past three years. MHCLG has published a HDT figure for every council area in England, and indicates it will re-calculate the HDT annually.

The purpose of the HDT is to hold local authorities to account over the supply of new housing.

Where the HDT shows the delivery of new homes has fallen below 95% of the district or borough's housing requirement over the previous three years, the council should prepare an Action Plan to assess the causes of under-delivery and identify actions to increase delivery in future years.

Where the HDT shows a district's housing delivery is less than 85%, the c…

Review of Planning Appeal: The tricky task of planning for housing development - Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan

I previously posted about why it is important to include policies and site allocations for housing, in order to "presumption-proof" your Neighbourhood Plan. A recent planning appeal (APP/R1038/W/17/3192255), which resulted in the granting of planning permission for 180 homes at Wingerworth, Derbyshire, illustrates the importance of making provision for housing development in a Neighbourhood Plan.

North East Derbyshire Council ranks settlements in a hierarchy. Wingerworth is located firmly in the middle of the hierarchy as a "Settlement with good levels of sustainability", so presumably has some merits as a location for housing development.

The Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan (WNP) successfully passed the referendum stage in June 2018. The WNP includes a number of policies which relate to the provision of housing development, for example:

Policy W1 defines a settlement development limit around the built area of Wingerworth village, offering in principle support to de…

Appeal granted in countryside despite Five Year Land Supply - Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan

Through a recent appeal decision, a Planning Inspector has granted outline planning permission for up to 55 dwellings and 'Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace' (SANG) at land at Parklands, east of Basingstoke Road, Spencers Wood, Wokingham.

The decision was issued on 28th February 2019, under appeal reference APP/X0360/W/18/3204133.

The appeal site is located between two villages, Three Mile Cross and Spencers Wood. The scheme proposes two areas of development adjoining each of the villages, separated by an area of open space - a 'SANG'.
Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan The Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) was made in February 2017. Policy 1 of the SNP addresses the location of development:

In Shinfield Parish, development within the Development Limits..., will be supported; development adjacent to the Development Limits will only be supported where the benefits of the development outweigh its adverse impacts. 

'Development limits' are a very common planning …

Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire

An appeal decision initially caught my eye due to its surprising interpretation of 'infill development' -  but also raises some concerning issues around how Neighbourhood Plan policies are applied during the decision-making process.

The appeal relates to an application for the construction of up to 140 dwellings, new public open space, associated landscaping and site infrastructure on a 3.9ha site at Chinnor, Oxfordshire. The application was made by Persimmon Homes and initially refused by South Oxfordshire District Council. The appeal was allowed, meaning the Planning Inspector went against the district council's decision grant planning permission for the scheme. Details of the appeal can be found using the following reference APP/Q3115/W/17/3187058. Neighbourhood Plan & Development Plan Chinnor is a large village in Oxfordshire. The Chinnor Neighbourhood Plan (CNP) was 'made' in October 2017. When the appeal commenced, the Neighbourhood Plan was less than one…

Appeal rejected due to loss of open space: East Langton Neighbourhood Plan

A recent appeal for 5 dwellings has been rejected by a Planning Inspector, in part, due to conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan - despite a Local Green Space designation having been removed during examination.

The development proposal, for the erection of 5 dwellings and children’s play area with associated vehicular access at land rear of the Hanbury Centre, Stonton Road, Church Langton LE16 7SZ, was initially refused outline planning permission by Harborough District Council. The subsequent appeal was dismissed by a Planning Inspector, see appeal reference: APP/F2415/W/18/3212873.

Relevant to this appeal is the East Langton Neighbourhood Plan (ELNP), which was formally made by Harborough District Council in June 2018.
Impact on open space, sport and recreation In assessing the scheme, the Planning Inspector's main concern was that the development would lead to the loss of an open space used for sports and recreation.

The ELNP seeks to retain the appeal site as an open space, indi…

Conflict with a Neighbourhood Plan & how to provide certainty on the location of development

Recently I wrote about two appeal decisions where planning permission was granted for housing development, despite the sites not being identified for development within the respective Neighbourhood Plans for the area. See Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire and Review of Planning Appeal: The tricky task of planning for housing development (Wingerworth Neighbourhood Plan).

These examples, and other similar cases, raise a wider question about what constitutes 'conflict' with a Neighbourhood Plan.
A recent High Court ruling, issued in September 2018, has 'tested' this issue. The claim was lodged by Chichester District Council (CDC) against the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, and Beechcroft Ltd. The High Court decision is available to view on the BAILII website.
In this post, I have summarised the appeal decision and High Court decision, and conclude by offering some advice to ensure your Neighbourhood Plan p…

1,000th Neighbourhood Plan marks continued growth of neighbourhood planning

February 2020 saw an important milestone achieved, with the total number of approved Neighbourhood Plans reaching 1,000.
About the Planfinder data All Things Neighbourhood Planning's Planfinder app provides the data source for this blog post.

The Planfinder is a database of all Neighbourhood Plans which have successfully passed referendum. The Planfinder is maintained and updated regularly from ATNP's own research and monitoring of Neighbourhood Plan progress.

Joint Neighbourhood Plans (i.e. covering multiple parishes) and Neighbourhood Plans crossing a local authority boundary (i.e. forming part of the development plan in multiple local authority areas), are counted only once.

The Neighbourhood Plan data described in this post also includes Neighbourhood Development Orders and Community Right to Build Orders, as these are closely related to Neighbourhood Plans, follow a similar process in their preparation, and also fall under the 'umbrella' term of neighbourhood pla…