Skip to main content

How many new homes should a site deliver?

Neighbourhood Plan, number of new homes site should deliver
The number of homes allocated by Local and Neighbourhood Plans on individual development sites can be an emotive issue for local people, particularly where a development proposal differs from what the plan says.

At the plan-making stage, it can be quite tricky to estimate the number of homes a site can accommodate (the site's capacity). In addition to dwellings, a development proposal may include any number of other features which reduce the area of land available for development, such as public open space; Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDs); landscaping and planting; infrastructure, such as roads and utilities; and other land uses, such as employment, retail, etc. In addition, a site may be constrained by physical features such as topography, watercourses, infrastructure, habitats and geology.

The design and layout of a scheme will influence the number of homes the site can accommodate. Proposals for high-density flats and apartments will clearly deliver more homes than proposals for low density detached dwellings (on the same size site).

Often, the precise number of dwellings a site can accommodate is not figured out until the planning application stage. The applicant will submit plans and designs as part of the planning application, which may change following negotiations with the local authority.

Housing figures in Local and Neighbourhood Plans

When allocating sites in either Local Plans or Neighbourhood Plans, there are no hard and fast rules for how a site's capacity should be estimated or described. When writing a plan it wouldn't usually be practical to carry out a detailed master-planning exercise of the site, therefore the site's capacity must be estimated in some way.  Different plans deal with this issue in different ways:

  • Maximum limit: Some plans will set a precise upper limit on the number of homes a site can accommodate. In such cases, this may be expressed as a 'maximum' limit. Usually, this is applied where there is some evidence that exceeding the threshold will result in harm.
  • Range of values: Some plans may apply an upper and lower limit, with the assumption that the actual number of dwellings permitted on the site will be somewhere between the two values. This helps to show that the exact site capacity is not known at the time of writing the plan, but implies that the minimum and maximum values are appropriate, or that development outside the range will be unacceptable. It also raises issues around how the total number of dwellings the plan will deliver should be calculated.
  • Indicative or estimated site capacity: Some plans simply make an estimate of the site capacity, usually, using a formula or set of assumptions about the proportion of the site available for development and the likely density of new development. This is usually accompanied by some sort of caveat explaining that the indicative figure is just a 'guide' and may in practice be exceeded/not met. The benefit of this approach is that it is simple - there is just one number to deal with. However, this can imply that the indicative number is the 'correct' one. When an application is submitted, the number of proposed dwellings may be markedly different from the 'indicative' figure (for reasons discussed at the top of this page). In some cases applicants have faced an uphill battle in demonstrating the scheme is appropriate, where local people and decision-makers may have a bias toward the indicative figure - in other words, sometimes people 'latch on' to the indicative figure, and are shocked when the actual development proposals is for a markedly higher or lower number of dwellings.
  • No site capacity figure at all: Some plans may opt to not include an estimate of site capacity. Instead, they may simply describe the site and provide a measurement of the site area. This raises the issue that it is not clear to applicants and the wider community about how many homes the site is likely to deliver. It can also make it tricky to work out how many dwellings the plan will deliver in total.

When allocating sites in a Neighbourhood Plan, in most cases the 'indicative site capacity' approach will likely be the preferred approach. In most cases, there simply won't be sufficient evidence to set firm limits on the amount of development a site can accommodate.

Review of appeal decision: Dunholme, Lincolnshire

A recent appeal decision illustrates how an 'indicative' or approximate site capacity figure works in practice. There are likely to be countless other planning decisions which discuss the issue, but I picked this one because a) the decision was issued very recently, and b) the site is allocated in a Neighbourhood Plan.

Development proposal

The development proposal, for 64 dwellings with roads, garages and residential parking including community parking and public open spaces at land at Honeyholes Lane, Dunholme, Lincolnshire, was initially refused by West Lindsey District Council (WLDC), but following an appeal was granted full planning permission by a Planning Inspector.

Appeal decision

The site is allocated in the Dunholme Neighbourhood Plan (DNP) for "approximately 49 dwellings". The Central Lincolnshire Plan (CLLP), which was adopted after the Dunholme Neighbourhood Plan was made, also allocates the site for 49 dwellings, but notes that this figure is "indicative".

At the time at which these plans were made / adopted, the site already had outline planning permission for 49 dwellings, which likely explains how the indicative figure had been chosen.

In his decision, the Planning Inspector noted that neither the CLLP nor the DNP place a ceiling on the amount of development which can be delivered on the site. The proposed increase of 15 dwellings, from 49 to 64 dwellings, represents a 31% increase, which the Planning Inspector considered to be a "not insignificant increase".

The increase in proposed number of dwellings was clearly a contentious issue. WLDC claims it had initially justified the approval of the previous scheme (for 49 dwellings) due to its "low density nature being appropriate to an edge of settlement site that marked the transition from open countryside to built-up area". However, the Planning Inspector observed the local character and landscape surrounding the site and concluded:
I am not persuaded that the proposal for 64 dwellings would be harmful in the context of the detail of the proposal or the nature of the site’s surroundings
The test for determining whether 64 dwellings is appropriate is not, to what extent the indicative housing figure differs from the indicative site capacity figurebut instead is what harm will result from the development.

How to deal with site capacity and density in your Neighbourhood Plan

As highlighted by the Dunholme appeal case, indicative site capacity figures are fairly arbitrary. The precise number of dwellings which is 'right' for a site will be determined through the planning application process.

Your Neighbourhood Plan should generally avoid setting maximum site site capacity, unless you have compelling evidence that this number must not be exceeded. One example could be where the local highways authority has specified that a road junction has limited capacity, thereby placing a limit on development (unless a technical solution to the problem can be found).

Higher density development does have its advantages. It uses land more efficiently, and can enable more people to live closer to service and facilities, in other words, it is more sustainable. The NPPF (para. 122) requires planning policies and decisions to support proposals which make efficient use of land.

However, in some locations it may be more appropriate to provide lower density forms of development. For example, to reflect the character of surrounding development or, in an edge of settlement location, to create a transition from the built area to the countryside.

Rather than becoming too fixated on the amount of development a site should accommodate, instead focus on what that development should be like, and think about the ways you can influence the style of development through your policies.

You could undertake an assessment of the landscape and character of your area. You don't need to cover the entire Neighbourhood Area, but could simply focus on those areas which are most sensitive, for example, the 'edges' of the settlement where it joins the open countryside, or parts of the built area which have a distinct architectural style. This doesn't need to simply be the 'historic' areas (such as within a Conservation Area) - modern development has 'character' too.

This week the Environment Agency, Forestry Commission, Historic England and Natural England has published, via Locality, a guide on how to consider the environment in Neighbourhood Plans, titled Neighbourhood Planning for the Environment. The guide covers a broad range of themes and helpfully identifies where you can find existing evidence on environmental issues and provides guidance on assessing environmental issues - including carrying out your own assessments of the natural and built environment within your Neighbourhood Area.

Once you have gathered evidence, you can use this to inform your policies. A set of well-written, criteria-based policies, based on robust evidence, can ensure that the design and form of development responds sensitively to the local environment. This approach will likely ensure that new development is appropriate for its location, irrespective of the number of new homes it delivers. As always, refer to the Locality guide, Writing Planning Policies.


'Indicative' or estimated housing figures for development sites, as set out in Local Plans and Neighbourhood Plans are often of limited importance when determining planning applications. Where the local environment or landscape is particularly sensitive, use well-written, evidence-based policies to ensure new development complements the area. 


Popular posts from this blog

Why the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan failed

News that the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan was rejected at referendum has spread rapidly across social media and has even been picked up by local and national press - see BBC article.

The story has garnered a lot of attention as it is highly unusual for a Neighbourhood Plan to be rejected. The Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan is only the third Neighbourhood Plan not to be supported by residents.

At the referendum held on 14 March 2019, the Neighbourhood Plan was rejected, albeit by a very slim margin of just 22 votes.
'No' Campaign Prior to the referendum, Labour town councillors led a campaign which encouraged local people to vote against the Neighbourhood Plan. 
Based on the literature shared by the campaign group, opposition to the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan appears to be pointed at three key issues: Impacts on the town and its infrastructure of the overall scale of growth Middlewich is expected deliverDisagreement with the individual sites identified by the Neighbourhood …

Latest stats show continued increase in house-building

Chart: All Things Neighbourhood Planning
Data source: Live tables on housebuilding: new build dwellings (Table 209), MHCLG

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government has today published its latest data on house building in the United Kingdom. The graph shows the number of dwellings completed by financial year in England. Data is also available for the other home nations. However, Neighbourhood Planning is a feature of the English planning system only.

In 2017/18, there were more than 160,500 new homes constructed. - the highest rate of development since the financial crisis of 2007-08. As illustrated in the graph, the data shows a steady increase in number of homes built each year since the low-point of 2012-13, where less than 108,000 homes were built. 

The rate of development in 2017/18 is comparable to the period 2004 - 2006. Assuming this trend of increasing development rates continues into the current financial year, the number of homes constructed in 2018/19 could po…

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans made in July 2019

Neighbourhood Plans provide a bespoke planning framework for the local area. No two plans are alike, although many have similar characteristics and address common themes. This post provides a short summary of those Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in July 2019, highlighting the elements which make each plan locally specific and unique.

The purpose of this post is to celebrate the achievement of those communities in successfully preparing their Neighbourhood Plans, and to share the interesting ideas and policies for the benefit of others who are currently writing their plans. Links to the Neighbourhood Plans are provided throughout the post.
Navigate this post using the map July was a busy month, with a whopping 24 Neighbourhood Plans successfully passing referendum. To  make it easier to navigate this post, the location of the areas covered by each new Neighbourhood Plan are shown on the interactive map. Click on a marker to reveal a link to the plan's su…

Just how big is an infill site? Appeal decision: Chinnor, Oxfordshire

An appeal decision initially caught my eye due to its surprising interpretation of 'infill development' -  but also raises some concerning issues around how Neighbourhood Plan policies are applied during the decision-making process.

The appeal relates to an application for the construction of up to 140 dwellings, new public open space, associated landscaping and site infrastructure on a 3.9ha site at Chinnor, Oxfordshire. The application was made by Persimmon Homes and initially refused by South Oxfordshire District Council. The appeal was allowed, meaning the Planning Inspector went against the district council's decision grant planning permission for the scheme. Details of the appeal can be found using the following reference APP/Q3115/W/17/3187058. Neighbourhood Plan & Development Plan Chinnor is a large village in Oxfordshire. The Chinnor Neighbourhood Plan (CNP) was 'made' in October 2017. When the appeal commenced, the Neighbourhood Plan was less than one…

Putting Health & Wellbeing at the Heart of Neighbourhood Planning

The planning system's origins can be traced back to public health policies from the nineteenth century. Increases in population and the growth of towns created public health problems, and early legislation focused on creating sanitary conditions.

There is a sense that in recent decades planning has lost its way with health, yet our modern environments continue to have profound effects on our health and well-being. In the blog post What stops us from creating healthier places? author Rachel Toms notes that overall, the planning system has done a good job of designing infectious diseases out of the places in which people live, but has "inadvertently contributed to sedentary lifestyles, mental distress and social isolation".

Whilst the planning system has cured the public health problems of the industrial revolution, it faces a new set of public health challenges for the modern era.

In this post, I make the case for prioritising health and wellbeing through Neighbourhood P…

Appeal granted in countryside despite Five Year Land Supply - Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan

Through a recent appeal decision, a Planning Inspector has granted outline planning permission for up to 55 dwellings and 'Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace' (SANG) at land at Parklands, east of Basingstoke Road, Spencers Wood, Wokingham.

The decision was issued on 28th February 2019, under appeal reference APP/X0360/W/18/3204133.

The appeal site is located between two villages, Three Mile Cross and Spencers Wood. The scheme proposes two areas of development adjoining each of the villages, separated by an area of open space - a 'SANG'.
Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan The Shinfield Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) was made in February 2017. Policy 1 of the SNP addresses the location of development:

In Shinfield Parish, development within the Development Limits..., will be supported; development adjacent to the Development Limits will only be supported where the benefits of the development outweigh its adverse impacts. 

'Development limits' are a very common planning …

Neighbourhood Planning and Community Health and Wellbeing - Briefing Note for NALC

I have teamed up with the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) to author a briefing note on Neighbourhood Planning and Community Health and Wellbeing.

The briefing note illustrates how Neighbourhood Plans can actively contribute to improving health and wellbeing in their communities, and draws on recent examples of neighbourhood plan policies. Neighbourhood Plans can tackle issues of health and wellbeing in lots of different ways, as explained in the briefing note, and is something I will be making the case for in future blog posts.

A pdf version of the briefing note is available to view and download below. Further advice on neighbourhood planning is also available from NALC's website.

Neighbourhood Plan Review: Plans Made in September 2019

This post explores Neighbourhood Plans which successfully passed referendum in September 2019, highlighting elements which make each plan locally specific and unique. The following Neighbourhood Plans passed referendum in September 2019:
Bawtry Neighbourhood Plan (Doncaster Council)Brackenfield Neighbourhood Plan (North East Derbyshire District Council)Chelford Neighbourhood Plan (Cheshire East Council)Congresbury Neighbourhood Plan (North Somerset Council)Glentworth Neighbourhood Plan (West Lindsey District Council)Hanslope Neighbourhood Plan (Milton Keynes Council)Hullavington Neighbourhood Plan (Wiltshire Council)Huntingdon Neighbourhood Plan (Huntingdonshire District Council)Misterton Neighbourhood Plan (Bassetlaw District Council)Moreton, Bobbingworth and the Lavers Neighbourhood Plan (Epping Forest District Council)Sedgefield Neighbourhood Plan (Durham County Council)Sedgeford Neighbourhood Plan (Kings Lynn & West Norfolk District Council)Sid Valley Neighbourhood Plan (Sidmo…

Essential reading for Neighbourhood Planners

Through my site I have attempted to explain the neighbourhood planning process, and provide regular blog posts on the latest issues affecting neighbourhood planning. But where can you go to find out more?

In this article I attempt to summarise where you should go for the most useful information and guidance, and where you can find funding and support for writing a Neighbourhood Plan.
Locality Toolkits and Guidance Locality administer the government's current programme of support for neighbourhood planning groups, and Locality's site should be your first port of call when writing a Neighbourhood Plan.
Locality has produced an excellent series of 'toolkits & guidance' on a range of issues to assist the preparation of neighbourhood plans. It is difficult to understate how valuable Locality's guides are for budding neighbourhood planners. Be sure you don't miss: The Neighbourhood Plans Roadmap 2018 by Dave …

Secretary of State overturns Planning Inspector's decision due to density concerns

Normally, planning appeals are determined by Planning Inspectors, but in some circumstances appeals may be 'recovered' for determination by the Secretary of State (SoS). The current SoS for Housing, Communities and Local Government is James Brokenshire MP.

In December 2018, the SoS issued a decision on a recovered appeal at Woburn Sands, Buckinghamshire. The proposal for residential development of up to 203 dwellings, a doctor’s surgery, open space and landscaping, together with pedestrian, cycle and vehicular access, was initially refused by Milton Keynes Council, and following appeal, granted permission by a Planning Inspector. However, the SoS recovered the appeal and overturned the Inspector's decision, dismissing the appeal.

Details of the case are available on the Planning Inspectorate's website, using case reference: APP/Y0435/W/17/3169314.
Appeal site & Neighbourhood Plan The appeal site is a 15.2 hectare, greenfield site, located outside the development bo…